Buscar
Estás en modo de exploración. debe iniciar sesión para usar MEMORY

   Inicia sesión para empezar

LF263 Evolution L13-14


🇬🇧
In Inglés
Creado:


Public
Creado por:
Alex Rapai


5 / 5  (1 calificaciones)



» To start learning, click login

1 / 19

[Front]


Finding key genes
[Back]


Differential gene expression of differently looking animals at the *same* stage, same cells. Gene expression list – verify by RNA ISH Verify gene function by misexpression or knockdown Assay: 1.How do genes found thus regulate each other? RNA ISH 2. Can we recover ancient morphologies or morphologies of related Species by changing gene expression during this same ontogenetic stage

Practique preguntas conocidas

Manténgase al día con sus preguntas pendientes

Completa 5 preguntas para habilitar la práctica

Exámenes

Examen: pon a prueba tus habilidades

Pon a prueba tus habilidades en el modo de examen

Aprenda nuevas preguntas

Popular en este curso

elección múltipleModo de elección múltiple

Modos dinámicos

InteligenteMezcla inteligente de todos los modos
PersonalizadoUtilice la configuración para ponderar los modos dinámicos

Modo manual [beta]

Seleccione sus propios tipos de preguntas y respuestas
Otros modos disponibles

Aprende con fichas
Completa la oración
Escuchar y deletrearOrtografía: escribe lo que escuchas
Expresión oralResponde con voz
Expresión oral y comprensión auditivaPractica la pronunciación
EscrituraModo de solo escritura

LF263 Evolution L13-14 - Marcador

los usuarios han completado este curso

Ningún usuario ha jugado este curso todavía, sé el primero


LF263 Evolution L13-14 - Detalles

Niveles:

Preguntas:

19 preguntas
🇬🇧🇬🇧
Finding key genes
Differential gene expression of differently looking animals at the *same* stage, same cells. Gene expression list – verify by RNA ISH Verify gene function by misexpression or knockdown Assay: 1.How do genes found thus regulate each other? RNA ISH 2. Can we recover ancient morphologies or morphologies of related Species by changing gene expression during this same ontogenetic stage
Calmodulin Signalling pathways
Activated by Ca2+, activate CaMKII and CaN. CaN activated NFAT (TF). CALM activates CaMIV and CREB (TF)
Calmodulin CaM
Earlier: Levels and extent of Calmodulin expression in the upper beak correlates with upper beak shape/size across the Darwin finches. The more in the mesenchyme, the more pointed the beak!
BMP4
Early BMP4 expression Correlates with deep and wide beak. Signalling pathway: Canonical (smads) and non-canonical (Ras Raf etc)
Premaxilla
Variation in expression of genes TGFbeta signalling (for depth and length not width). Wnt pathway (beta catenin). In upper beak Correlates with beak shape Differences.
Epistatic relationships during beak development.
Alk5 and DKK3 (for depth and length but not width) upregulates CaM, BMP4 does not. BMP4 overexpression downregulates Itself. Differential effects on bone and cartilage
FGF8
To make the rostrum in Paleognathous and Neognathae
FGF inhibition
Affects the premaxilla and the palatine bone
Human Genome Project
Only 1.5% is protein coding Highly conserved non-protein coding elements Regulatory evolution is faster than protein coding gene evolution 15% of CNEs from 120-90 Mya evolved from transposons. Most of the euchromatic genome is transcribed at a low level
Long haplotypes at high frequency satisfy:
Derived alleles Differentiation between the three main human populations Alleles with known biological effects
SNPs freq shows the basis for Tibetan adaptation to altitude
EPAS1 is a transcription factor associated with hypoxia – linked to high erythrocyte count Han and Tibetan populations estimated to have diverged 2750 years ago (Fst = 0.026, fairly low differentiation) Fastest selective sweep identified to date
Four major loci have been identified
Microcephalin (MCPH) – brain development ASPM – brain development FOXP2 – speech development HAR1 – brain development
Microcephalin phylogeny
The phylogeny of microcephalin haplotypes is unusual ‘lopsided’ suggestive of introgression recently (~40,000 years ago) – matches up conveniently with modern human contact with Neanderthals Did we get our brains from Neanderthals? possible
ASPM
Abnormal spindle-like microcephaly associated. Very high frequency of one haplotype Big problem – no phenotype is associated with haplogroup D, - if there is selection we don’t know what it was for. Dangerous inferences: scientifically and sociologically
FOXP2
Transcription factor forkhead box 2 Mutations at FOXP2 are associated with speech disorders in humans Two significant amino acid changes occur in humans, and virtually no variation in humans The derived gene also occurred in Neanderthals
Human accelerated regions (HARs)
Previous examples focused on amino acid changes A study scanned entire genome for phylogenetic branch lengths longer in humans compared to chimpanzee, rat and mouse 49 HARs identified, 96% were non-coding RNAs, 24% were adjacent to neurodevelopmental genes HAR1 most significant, involved in cortical development: 18 substitutions occurred where 0.27 expected
Gene duplication episodes in humans
Identified inparalogs humans vs mouse using Inparanoid. Compared potential human inparalogs with chimp sequences phylogenetic analysis for each hum/chimp set and removed all molecular clock violations and only retained topologies
The Neanderthal Genome
Allows us to see what is specifically ‘human’ rather than hominin Genome obtained from 3 bones from Vindija Suggests a divergence between humans and Neanderthal’s of 825, 000 years Only 78 derived nucleotides fixed in human lineage but ancestral in Neandertals.
Detection of selective sweeps
Identification of older blocks of genome that tend to be derived in human and ancestral in Neanderthal THADA strongest signal