Our right to health: A difference in treatment (e.g. no access to Dutch coffee shops based on residence) can be qualified as an indirect discrimination, however can be justified by overriding reasons in the general interest (e.g. the objective of combating drug tourism and the accompanying public nuisance).

Question

A difference in treatment (e.g. no access to Dutch coffee shops based on residence) can be qualified as an indirect discrimination, however can be justified by overriding reasons in the general interest (e.g. the objective of combating drug tourism and the accompanying public nuisance).

Lena Larsen · Accepted Answer

true, this is the principle and exception approach mentioned in our first session]

Our right to health

A difference in treatment (e.g. no access to Dutch coffee shops based on residence) can be qualified as an indirect discrimination, however can be justified by overriding reasons in the general interest (e.g. the objective of combating drug tourism and the accompanying public nuisance).

True, this is the principle and exception approach mentioned in our first session]

Autor