Weber's three types of legitimate authority

(Advanced power framework) Weber defines authority as power which people accept. Types of authority: 1. Charismatic authority: Based on personal qualities of the leader. Often the case with start-ups, people allow themselves to be governed because of the charisma of the leader. One issue is that of the leader loses his/her charisma, they also lose their entire authority, and the governing style will likely move toward formal-rational. 2. Traditional authority: The authority comes from the fact that the leading style has been perpetuated for an extensive time period. According to Weber, traditional authority can cement inequality, as it does not allow for a meritocracy. 3. Formal-rational authority: According to Weber the most developed and civilized type of authority. The authority is not based on traditions nor charismatic abilities, but on the positions which individuals hold in a hierarchical structure. With every position comes an associated authority. In a functioning formal-rational structure, this means a meritocracy is possible to achieve. Interesting point: Weber felt that although formal-rational authority was preferable, it contributed to an extensive rationalization of everything in society, which he ultimately believed results in life being drained of its meaning.