Buscar
🇪🇸
MEM
O
RY
.COM
4.37.48
Invitado
Iniciar sesión
Página de inicio
0
0
0
0
0
Crear curso
Cursos
Último juego
Panel
Notificaciones
Clases
Carpetas
Exámenes
Exámenes personalizados
Ayuda
Marcador
Tienda
Premios
Amigos
Asignaturas
Modo oscuro
Identificador de usuario: 999999
Versión: 4.37.48
www.memory.es
Estás en modo de exploración. debe iniciar sesión para usar
MEM
O
RY
Inicia sesión para empezar
Index
»
Fair Housing
»
Chapter 1
»
Court Cases
level: Court Cases
Questions and Answers List
level questions: Court Cases
Question
Answer
Missouri. Blacks arent citizens, therefore cant sue
Dred Scott vs Sanford, 1857
Created "separate but equal" legal theory
Plessy vs Ferguson, 1883
U.S. Supreme Court refused to impose a restrictive covenant in housing against individuals of Chinese descent
Gandolfo vs Hartman, 1892
First code of ethics in real estate, modified in 1934 to incorporate racial exclusion
National Assoc of Real Estate Boards Code of Ethics, 1913
Kentucky. A city ordinance prohibited the sale of real property to black individuals which was in violation of the 14th Amendment
Buchanan vs Warley, 1917
New York City. Private housing developments can discriminate
Stuyvesant/Peter Cooper Village vs NY, 1947
US Supreme Court ruled racially restrictive covenants were unconstitutional
Hurd vs Hodge, 1948
"Separate but equal" gets reversed, segregation unconstitutional
Brown vs Board of Education, 1954
Ruled that the CRA of 1866 banned private, as well as govt, racial discrimination in housing
Jones vs Alfred Mayer Co, 1968
Allowed tenants to sue their landlords for discriminatory rental practices
Trafficante vs Met Life Insurance, 1972
Bans discriminatory advertising. Modern basis for established HUD advertising rules
United States vs Hunter, 1972
Legalized secret shopping/testing to verify fair housing practices in realty
Haven Realty vs Coleman, 1982