Buscar
🇪🇸
MEM
O
RY
.COM
4.37.48
Invitado
Iniciar sesión
Página de inicio
0
0
0
0
0
Crear curso
Cursos
Último juego
Panel
Notificaciones
Clases
Carpetas
Exámenes
Exámenes personalizados
Ayuda
Marcador
Tienda
Premios
Amigos
Asignaturas
Modo oscuro
Identificador de usuario: 999999
Versión: 4.37.48
www.memory.es
Estás en modo de exploración. debe iniciar sesión para usar
MEM
O
RY
Inicia sesión para empezar
Index
»
Engineering Ethics
»
Chapter 1
»
Pt. 1 - Tort
level: Pt. 1 - Tort
Questions and Answers List
level questions: Pt. 1 - Tort
Question
Answer
Honest Mistake May Defy Negligence
Ramsay and Penno v. The King, 1952
Product Liability
Donoghue v. Stevenson, 1932
One Party Relies on Special Skills of 2nd party and 2nd party knows, 2nd part duty bound to take reasonable care
Hedley Byrne v. Heller, 1963
Disclaimer Absolves 3rd Party if Disclaimer is clear
Wolverine Tube v. Normanda, 1994
Engineers have duty that extends to 3rd party if failure creates dangerous effects
Winnipeg Condominium v. Bird Construction, 1995
Engineer has duty to note deficiency
Conama Contracting v. Huffman, 1983
When Disclaimer involved, test is if disclaimer is clear and reasonable
Micron v. Hong Kong Bank
Employer also held responsible
Dutton v. Bognor Regis United Building, 1972
Concurrent Tortfeasors - both architect and engineer responsible
Corp Dist. Of Surrey v. Carrol - Hatch, 1972
Can be liable for both tort and contract
Central Trust v. Rafuse, 1986
Manufacturer must provide proper labeling and instruction
Lem v. Barotto Sports & Ponsness - Warren, 1976
Instructions must be reasonable and provide level of detail not known to consumer
Lambert v. Lastoplex Chemical 1971