Problem of Evil
🇬🇧
In Inglés
In Inglés
Practique preguntas conocidas
Manténgase al día con sus preguntas pendientes
Completa 5 preguntas para habilitar la práctica
Exámenes
Examen: pon a prueba tus habilidades
Pon a prueba tus habilidades en el modo de examen
Aprenda nuevas preguntas
Modos dinámicos
InteligenteMezcla inteligente de todos los modos
PersonalizadoUtilice la configuración para ponderar los modos dinámicos
Modo manual [beta]
Seleccione sus propios tipos de preguntas y respuestas
Modos específicos
Aprende con fichas
Completa la oración
Escuchar y deletrearOrtografía: escribe lo que escuchas
elección múltipleModo de elección múltiple
Expresión oralResponde con voz
Expresión oral y comprensión auditivaPractica la pronunciación
EscrituraModo de solo escritura
Problem of Evil - Marcador
Problem of Evil - Detalles
Niveles:
Preguntas:
18 preguntas
| 🇬🇧 | 🇬🇧 |
| What are the two types of evil? | Moral and natural evil |
| What is the ‘Paradox of Omnipotence’? | ‘Can an omnipotent being make things which he cannot subsequently control’ or, ‘make rules which bind himself?’ To answer either yes or no would compromise omnipotence. Indeed, for Mackie, the notion of omnipotence seemed illogical in our world. |
| What is an example of a statistic used by Gregory S. Paul? | For example, demographic statistics that detail the full extent of the early death of immature humans through natural evil: ‘the estimated total prematurity loss of conceived humans is in the area of 350 billion.’ |
| Who are the key thinkers when it comes to the problem of evil? | Epicurus, J.L Mackie, William Rowe and Gregory S. Paul |
| What did Gregory S. Paul believe? | Paul’s main point is that there is a complete denial of free will to new-born, and premature, human beings. This does not work with any theodicy based in the God of classical theism. |
| What did Gregory S. Paul believe? | Paul’s main point is that there is a complete denial of free will to new-born, and premature, human beings. This does not work with any theodicy based in the God of classical theism. |
| Key quotes from Epicurus? | “Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; or he can, but does not want to. If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked.” |
| What is the ‘Paradox of Omnipotence’? | ‘Can an omnipotent being make things which he cannot subsequently control’ or, ‘make rules which bind himself?’ To answer either yes or no would compromise omnipotence. Indeed, for Mackie, the notion of omnipotence seemed illogical in our world. |
| What is the ‘Paradox of Omnipotence’? | ‘Can an omnipotent being make things which he cannot subsequently control’ or, ‘make rules which bind himself?’ To answer either yes or no would compromise omnipotence. Indeed, for Mackie, the notion of omnipotence seemed illogical in our world. |
| What did J.L Mackie believe in? | ‘inconsistent triad’; |
| What is the inconsistent triad? | Evil and suffering are incompatible with the notions of omnipotence and omnibenevolence. |
| Key quotes from Epicurus? | “Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; or he can, but does not want to. If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked.” |
| What was J.L Mackie's views on theodicies? | Mackie also pointed out that any theodicy depends upon re-interpreting the idea of omnipotence and so is not successful. Either God is omnipotent in its fullest sense or God is not omnipotent. There is no in between. |
| NA | NA |
| What did J.L Mackie use to demonstrate the problem of evil at a basic level? | ‘Paradox of Omnipotence’ |
| What is the ‘Paradox of Omnipotence’? | ‘Can an omnipotent being make things which he cannot subsequently control’ or, ‘make rules which bind himself?’ To answer either yes or no would compromise omnipotence. Indeed, for Mackie, the notion of omnipotence seemed illogical in our world. |
| Key quotes from J.L Mackie? | “Quite apart from the problem of evil, the Paradox of Omnipotence has shown that God’s omnipotence must in any case be restricted in one way or another.” |
| What did William Rowe believe in? | Rowe’s argument is that if there are instances of intense suffering that God could do something about without impacting the greater good then it is logical to assume that God could, by definition, prevent this. |
| Key quotes from Epicurus? | “Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; or he can, but does not want to. If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked.” |
| Where does Rowe argue that evil is unnecessary? | However, there are instances of unnecessary intense suffering, for example a fawn that is ‘trapped, horribly burned, and lies in terrible agony for several days before death relieves its suffering.’ |
| Why does Rowe believe unnecessary evil reduces God's omnipotence? | God, by definition, could and should prevent this (because it would not interfere with free will) but does not. Therefore, there are rational grounds for rejecting an omnipotent, omniscient, wholly-good being. |
| Key quotes from William Rowe? | “Intense human or animal suffering is in itself bad, an evil, even though it may sometimes be justified by virtue of being a part of, or leading to, some good which is unobtainable without it.” |
| What did Gregory S. Paul believe? | Paul’s main point is that there is a complete denial of free will to new-born, and premature, human beings. This does not work with any theodicy based in the God of classical theism. |
| What is an example of a statistic used by Gregory S. Paul? | For example, demographic statistics that detail the full extent of the early death of immature humans through natural evil: ‘the estimated total prematurity loss of conceived humans is in the area of 350 billion.’ |
| How does Gregory S. Paul prove his point? | Gregory S. Paul used statistics to demonstrate the extent and indiscriminate nature of human suffering through natural evil. |
| Key quotes from Gregory S. Paul? | “It is said that God is in the details, and that the nature of creation reveals the nature of the creator. This is a valid point, but the implications are not necessarily what Christians wish for them to be.” |