Buratti
🇬🇧
In Inglés
In Inglés
Practique preguntas conocidas
Manténgase al día con sus preguntas pendientes
Completa 5 preguntas para habilitar la práctica
Exámenes
Examen: pon a prueba tus habilidades
Pon a prueba tus habilidades en el modo de examen
Aprenda nuevas preguntas
Modos dinámicos
InteligenteMezcla inteligente de todos los modos
PersonalizadoUtilice la configuración para ponderar los modos dinámicos
Modo manual [beta]
El propietario del curso no ha habilitado el modo manual
Modos específicos
Aprende con fichas
Completa la oración
Escuchar y deletrearOrtografía: escribe lo que escuchas
elección múltipleModo de elección múltiple
Expresión oralResponde con voz
Expresión oral y comprensión auditivaPractica la pronunciación
EscrituraModo de solo escritura
Buratti - Marcador
Buratti - Detalles
Niveles:
Preguntas:
29 preguntas
🇬🇧 | 🇬🇧 |
Marbury vs Madison (1804) | Marshall defines the constitution as a paramount law, judicial review of legislation |
McCullok vs. Maryland (1819) | Enlargement of the supreme court supremacy, necessary and proper clause |
Fletcher vs. Peck (1810) | Supreme court apply the principle Marbury vs Madison to state statuary law |
Barron vs. Baltimore (1833) | The federal bill of rights could not have been applied to the legislation of the state |
Scott vs Sanford (1857) | The supreme court stated that the federation had no power to establish rules over state law on the issue of slavery |
Plessy vs Ferguson (1896) | Supreme court declare that the two communities are “separate but equal”, a black man take a seat on a white bus. |
Lochner vs New York (1905) | The supreme court, who upheld the liberal economy, declared null the act of the state of New York which had introduced a maximum of working hours for backers. |
Brown vs. Board of education of Topeka (1954) | Declared that the division in school system between black and white is unconstitutional |
Loving vs Virginia (1967) | The court abolish the state law prohibiting interracial marriage |
Roe vs Wade (1973) | About the right of abortion |
Hobergefell vs Hodges (2005) | About the same sax marriage |
McDonald vs Chicago (2010) | Incorporation of the right to bears arms |
Buckley vs. Veleo (1976) | Limitation to freedom to speech justified by a superior interest in preventing political corruption |
INS vs Chanda (1983) | The supreme court struck down the legislative veto |
Clinton vs City of New York (1998) | The supreme court ruled that the Line item veto act (1996) is unconstitutional |
National federation of independent business vs Sebelius (2012) | The supreme court upheld the patient protection and affordable care act made by Obama |
ART 1, section 8 | Competences of the Supreme Court |
ART 6 | Supremacy clause = authority of the United States shall be the Supreme Law of the Land so hanno la priorita su qualsiasi legge statale in conflitto |
ART 5 | Amending procedure (proposal [2 modi] and ratification [2 modi]) rigidity of constitution |
13th amend | Abolish slavery |
14th amend | Due process, equal protection, privileges and immunities |
15th amend | Right to vote for everyone |
16th amend | Federal Government levy taxes according to the income tax 1913 Federal Reserve (central bank) |
JUDICIARY ACT (1891, 1925) | Creation of federal appellate courts |
BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING ACT (1921) | Federal budget proposals to the Congress (Bureau of Budget) |
VOTING RIGHTS ACT (1965) | Prohibits any racial discrimination in states’ legislation |
FEDERAL ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN ACT (1971) | Control private contribution to political campaign |
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET AND IMPOUNDMENT CONTROL ACT (1974) | Da al congress financial power |
LINE ITEM VETO ACT (1996) | President can veto a single provision of a bill |